Movie Analysis Essay on The Kings Speech

premiumpapers.netLooking for research paper writing help? Are you in High School, College, Masters, Bachelors or Ph.D All you need is to ask for research, term paper, thesis help written by a specialist in your academic field. When you buy a customized essay from We offer you an original, 0%- plagiarized and unique research paper written by a dedicated writer who is PhD or Masters qualified. is an experienced service with over 8 years experience having delivered over 79,500 essays over the years.

Get Your Essay Done by a Specialist

NB: Click Our Prices for more. Our starting prices are as shown below!

write my essay for me
We have over 10 years in the essay, term paper, research writing over the continents: US, UK, CAD, UAE, Russia, Netherlands, South Africa, Europe, Asia etc.

write my essay for me
We have a pool of 1112 seasoned & qualified veteran academic research writers in over 77+ fields.

write my essay for me
At revision is free if you are not satisfied, Our organization has a money back policy to ensure all our clients are satisfied and keep coming back

write my essay for me
Applying for an order is easy on our site, visit our order page and place all your order information if you have attachments upload them and we will write from scratch.

write my essay for me
For every order placed at, you will receive a plagiarism, grammar check report

write my essay for me is affordable, but our quality it premium since we have a huge pool of clients



Movie Analysis of the movie The Kings Speech dated 2010 

    The king’s speech is a movie directed by Tom Hooper. The movie was based on a royal king who was a stammer and could not express himself effectively. The film starts with an attempt by Prince Albert who to give a speech to his audience in a ceremony of the British Empire Exhibition. This is humorous attempt since his stammering nature makes the speech unpleasing and irritating to the audience (Mieder, 2010).

    On the story line of the film, it tells the story about the rise and fall of King George, who was the father to the Queen Elizabeth (current queen of England). Despite the prehistory knowledge that the audience have about England, the audience is caught in a surprise when it learns that England, which is one of the greatest monarchs, was once led by a stammering king. In addition, the fact that the King led England through the World War II leaves us at a shock. This is not only by the amazing way he used to communicate with the audience but also how he had his leadership skills. It is through the film that the audience is given a chance to learn how the king was helped. More so, how he was able to overcome his stammering problem during the war days until England became the victors. While watching the film, there are numerous themes that are learnt and highlighted. The essay is an analysis of the themes in the film (Mieder, 2010).

    From the film, a significant theme that leaders are taught is courage. His flaws required improvements that would enable him to master the desired behavior before he takes the throne of being the king of England. Unlike many other people, the king depicts a desirable behavior. He is seen not to be hopeless towards his desire of leading England despite his flaws (Wright, 2012). He bravely accepts his imperfectness and works towards improving his nature. Courage from where it is sourced? How it is used? the importance of giving your duties priority over personal satisfaction. A clear example from the past is the story of Goliath and David. The Philistine army was ready to attack Isreal. Saul, king of Israel, and his army were afraid of Goliath. David out of nowhere volunteered to fight against mighty Goliath. Armed with just a sling shot he was able to fire the stone and hit Goliath right at the head and he conquered. It took more than war prowess to fight Goliath. It was about understanding fear and overcoming it. This is relevant to Kings speech since there is a connection on how to overcome fear between the two.(Mieder, 2010).

    Leaders, who are significant people in every society, need to be surrounded by people who support them in unlocking their potentials other than people who add critics to their leadership. It is in the film that this theme becomes very evident. John Adams, who was a leader in England, was a successful leader of England. However, he wouldn’t have been successful if Abigail did not support him (Wright, 2012). On the other hand, considering King George, who was a stammer, required a speech psychoanalyst, Logue. Logue was an important person to the king. This was because he is responsible for the successful unleashing of George’s greatness and stammering nature. In addition, he played a great role in ensuring that George raised his self esteem and as well his leadership skills were improved. This was necessary as it was through Logue that George was able to realize his potential in leadership and as well the attempts he had in ensuring that his desire to lead England was achieved (Wright, 2012).

    Despite the high contribution that Logue had to George, he was an unexpected savior. He had some differences with other people who surrounded the king. Other than being an Australian, he was from a different class as with the king. However, this was not a hindrance towards unleashing the king’s potential. His ability to express himself his gift to associate with other people assisted him to be allowed into England alongside other people. This catches the audience as a surprise as rarely do we find someone with such a gift who is ready to mentor us without some personal interests (Wright, 2012). It is through this instance that it becomes clear that for leaders to improve on their leadership skills, they require top surround themselves with people who assist them to unlock their abilities.

     Friendship is another theme that is quite clear in the film. The relationship between the future king George, and the therapist, Lionel Logue is quite uncommon and based on different basis of friendship there should not be any relationship between the two different characters. A commoner and royalty, quite unheard of and this happened. The combination works because they see in one another something that can provide healing. In the friendship they are both able to hear from each other about their fears and what they long for in life. In this theme there is historical accuracy. This happens by characterization of Winston Chuchill in the film who is portrayed as a friend to King George. (Mieder, 2010).

    Importance of friends is another theme that is evident in the film. As from the dialogue between Lionel and Bertie, the brave nature of Bertie is clearly brought out when he tries to convince Lionel that he is the king (Wright, 2012). Despite his stammering nature, he states that he has the power to be heard. In addition, he continues and states that he has a voice that should be heard. Lionel is amazed by Bertie’s nature and concludes that he is the bravest man he had ever come across. It is through this instance that the audience is given a chance to understand the importance of friends. This is because, despite the fact that Lionel understood the stammering nature of Bertie, he did not discourage him. He encourages him that he is a brave man and promises to make him a good king who will lead England. Friends are important as they assist us in realizing what we believe in. On the other hand it is only through friends that we are able to realize our hidden abilities (Wright, 2012).

    Loyalty and honesty are leadership qualities that the director of the movie sets forward for the audience to understand. Leaders in different positions have some imperfections. While learning about these imperfections in the organizations, there are some managers who are hired to cover these imperfections of these leaders. While carrying out their duties, leaders who are not honest to the managers hired to cover over their shortcomings end up losing their positions when they fall in some scandals. However, leaders who are honest to the managers on their shortcomings survive these scandals (Logue, 2011). This is quite clear as from the film. Despite Albert being a stammer, he does not keep it as a secret but reveals it to other people around him. Acceptance of the flaw is important as it assisted him in overcoming his speech disorder. Loyalty is another leadership virtue that the audience is left to learn from the film. Albert is loyal Logue, who is his speech assistant. He describes his childhood experiences that he attributes to the stammering nature. While sharing his childhood experiences to Logue, Lionel is able to win over his loyalty of being a king of England and offers his assistance towards overcoming his flaw of stammering (Logue, 2011).

    Conflict, prevails in the film. The film scriptwriter uses conflicts as a show of how conflicts between friends can cause friendship failure and as well can be used to increase the friendship bond. This is evident in the film when the friendship between Logue and king is questioned. Logue’s qualifications are attacked and the social gap with the king is seen to increase (Logue, 2011). The audience is left to wonder if their friendship will be saved despite the increasing social gap between the two. However, analyzing the king’s friends, it gives a clue on the relationship between him and Logue. The king had few true friends and as Logue had been one individual who had played an important role in ensuring that the king’s speech disorder was dealt with. This made Logue significant despite the attack that was made on his credentials. Another conflict that prevails largely in the film is the conflict that faces Albert. Despite his position as the king, he is in a conflict with his stammering nature. He is not able to lender a speech clearly to the audience. This conflict continues in the film until when Logue plays the essential role of ensuring that Albert is able to deal with his stammering condition. These conflicts are important to the audience. The audience is given a chance on how to analyze the friends surrounding them. Despite the attack made on Logue’s credentials, the king does not conclude by judging him but rather analyzes the impact that he had to him. In addition, the audience is given a chance to understand the importance of accepting their real nature and as well focus on understanding their flaws (Logue, 2011).

    Leadership is a skill that is in one’s heart. As from the case of Bertie, he was able to read out the speech that was given to him by Logue while he was listening to music. While the music was playing in the background, he read the speech fluently while the symphony played in the background. In addition, while he uttered the cursing words, it was clear that he uttered them clearly without stammering. This leads us to the conclusion that Bertie stammered while he thought too much and tried too hard to read the speech. Perfectness was attained through letting go of the strain he put while trying to read the speech. Leadership is a quality that is within us. Having too much effort and paying a lot of attention can easily prevent the leader from realizing his goals. Therefore, success is attained through letting go of the strains that we have and speaking what is within us as it is with the case of Bertie (Mieder, 2010).
    In conclusion, it is clear that the film is relevant to the audience. As discussed above, the scriptwriter has used the stammering king as an inspiration to the audience. The effort that he puts in overcoming his flaws and at long last his success in leading England to World War II (Mieder, 2010).

Mieder, W. (2010). "Making a way out of no way": Martin Luther King's sermonic proverbial rhetoric. New York: Peter Lang.
Logue, M., & Conradi, P. (2011). The King's speech: How one man saved the British monarchy. London: Quercus.
Logue, M., & Conradi, P. (2011). The King's speech. London: Quercus.
Logue, M., & Conradi, P. (2011). The King's speech. London: Quercus.
Morrissey, M. (2011). Politics and the Paul's Cross sermons, 1558-1642. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wright, C. M. (2012). Listening to music. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth.